The Whip in Racing
Excerpt from Chapter 6 of Monty's
textbook, From My Hands to Yours
To obtain your own copy of Monty's textbook, please CLICK
HERE.
To do a dissertation on the whip in racing,
I feel the first thing a horseman should say is, “It
does not matter whether it’s racing or any other
discipline, the whip is the whip.”
Equus, the flight animal, is about 50 million years old.
If you accept the discovery by Dr. Louis Leakey of Lucy
in the Olduvai Gorge, then humans are approximately 3.2
million years old. We must conclude then that horses got
along just fine without human beings for 47 million years.
We are quick, however, to use the term “problem
horse,” a quite pompous statement from a species
so junior.
A scientific fact is that horses are flight animals and,
as the reader knows, they only have two goals in life
(survival and reproduction). Horses do not often think
strongly about reproduction during a race, which leaves
us with only one facet of a horse’s existence, his
goal to survive. Consider for a moment that we are human
beings dealing with horses under circumstances extremely
demanding and frightening to them. Knowing that they are
vitally concerned with their own survival, we often conclude
that the best course of action is to whip them and cause
them pain in the hopes that it will get them to run faster.
I submit that this is not only a bad decision from a humane
standpoint, but a worse decision where its effect is concerned.
Horses are “into-pain” animals. Their natural
tendency is to push into pressure, like a child does biting
on hard bread when cutting teeth. We may frighten a horse
the first few times we whip him in a race, but very soon
he may resent the whip and back-up to it, actually causing
him to run more slowly.
You so often hear the statement, “We need the whips
for safety’s sake,” but, in fact, nothing
could be further from the truth, because far more accidents
are caused by whips than are ever averted by whips. In
fact, if a jockey felt the need for a whip to guide the
horse, why not use a spongy, Nerf whip so that no pain
could be produced?
In a recent conversation with Trevor Denman (a race announcer
at the Santa Anita race track), he said to me that he
felt it would be a good idea if every time there was a
disqualification, the newspaper should read that, “the
horse ducked from the whip and interfered with the progress
of another horse and was thus disqualified.” Trevor
suggested that an extremely high percentage of disqualifications
were caused by using the whip. Further, he said that if
the bettors could understand that, they would be less
apt to insist that jockeys use the whips to verify that
they are trying.
Aside from whether it is effective or not, let us examine
for a moment how we stand with the rest of the world on
this issue. Nearly all the racing countries of the world
are dealing with the issue of the whip in ways that suggest
it will soon be obsolete. I believe Great Britain is down
to five strikes now, while Sweden has restricted the use
of the whip severely, and, I think, only in front of the
girth. In Germany, it is interesting to note that all
two-year-olds are ridden only with a soft Nerf whip, which
is handed to the jockey as he leaves the weighing room.
The United States is virtually the only country to fail
to act on what has become an important issue to race fans
the world over.
The third facet, and possibly the most important, is in
the area of public perception. We, in racing, need to
be pro-active. We need to realize that many potential
race fans abhor the use of the whip and are turned off
by our sport. What if we had whipless racing? Someone
would be first, someone would be last and someone would
be in the middle, exactly as it is with the whips. As
for finding the genetic aptitude for racing, would you
not prefer the winning horse to run out of a natural desire,
rather than running from pain? And, wouldn’t we
be more acceptable to our audience?
I believe the number of race fans would increase with
a strong promotional program featuring whipless racing.
As racehorse people, we often say we are giving the horse
a chance to do what he loves best, run. I believe that
is a true statement, but if it is what he loves best,
why do we have to whip him to do it? We do not.
It is my opinion that the best jockeys would still be
the best jockeys, and in fact, true horsemanship skills
would come to the front if we were to eliminate whipping.
|
An Interesting Fact:
Barbaro ran the last 1/4 mile of the Kentucky Derby
with the fastest time over that 1/4 mile since Secretariet
without ever feeling the whip of jockey Edgar Prado.
Click
here for more!
Prado never touched Barbaro with his whip, never
asked him to do anything more than was necessary.
His gentle handling of Barbaro had more to do with
humane rather than competitive considerations, Prado
says. "If he's running real hard, why should
he be punished?" he says. "I'm a horse
lover more than anything else."
|
I sincerely believe that the buggy whips
used at the starting gate cause far more trouble than
good. I have spent a good deal of my life studying equine
behavior at the starting gate and I am absolutely convinced
that the elimination of the whip would actually make life
easier for the starting-gate crews.
People love animals, and we are supposed to be a civilized
species. Is it not time for us to consider changing some
of our retained barbaric ways? We have stopped lashing
prisoners and whipping small children. Is it not time
that we stopped whipping our horses, flight animals, who
have no intention to hurt anyone? My goal is to leave
the world a better place than I found it—for horses
and people too. Racing could lead the horse industry in
this truly important area of humane treatment.
To obtain your own copy of Monty's textbook,
please CLICK
HERE.
CLICK
HERE to go back to the farm training page.